The Methodology of the Study
I visited and conducted research over a period of three
years in a total of twenty-one cities in the
United States and five cities outside the United States.
Cities in Which Research was
Conducted
In the United States
 | Aurora, Colorado |
 | Charlotte, North Carolina |
 | Colorado Springs, Colorado |
 | Gainesville, Florida |
 | Joplin, Missouri |
 | Kansas City, Missouri |
 | Laramie, Wyoming |
 | Las Vegas, Nevada |
 | Los Angeles (City), California |
 | Los Angeles (County), California |
 | Manatee County, Florida |
 | Rochester, New York |
 | Rock Springs, Wyoming |
 | San Francisco, California |
|
 | Sarasota, Florida |
 | Seattle, Washington |
 | Silverton, Colorado |
 | Southern UTE Reservation, Colorado |
 | Springfield, Missouri |
 | St. Louis, Missouri |
 | Wichita, Kansas |
Outside the United States
 | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
 | Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
 | Edmonton, Alberta, Canada |
 | London, England |
 | Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
|
Information presented in this book came from a variety of sources. Among
them were field observations, interviews,
participant observation and review
of literature. Both qualitative and quantitative
data served as evidence for describing and explaining.
I was also guided in my research by the same type of non-probability
judgmental sampling used by Katz and Webb in their study of the police
response to gangs - namely, maximum variation sampling.
(Katz
and Webb, 2004, p. 37) Maximum variation
sampling is characterized as "sampling as widely as possible within the
specified sociocultural context until exhaustion or redundancy is reached."
(Katz
and Webb, 2004, p. 37) That is, I continued to
interview and observe until the responses I was receiving to my questions or
the events I was observing became redundant. That's one reason why I stopped
riding with police gang units after riding with the twenty-third one. I was
seeing the same phenomena over and over. The only difference, generally
speaking, was that they were taking place in different locations and at
different times.
Observations
in the Field
Observations were made in a variety of different settings. Among them
were observing:
 | gang neighborhoods with
probation and parole officers and in marked and unmarked police gang unit cars
with gang unit officers and command personnel.
|
 | police shift briefings and
training programs.
|
 | gang investigator association
training conferences.
|
 | group treatment programs in
probation and parole offices and in community-based
treatment facilities.
|
 | inmates in prison who were
documented gang members.
|
 | public meetings of citizens
concerned about the gang situation in their neighborhoods.
|
 | gang task force groups at their regularly scheduled meetings.
|
 | "sweeps." |
|
Interviews
A total of 157 formal interviews were conducted. The interviews took place with:
 | gang unit police officers at city, county, and
federal task force levels,
|
 | police command personnel who supervised gang
units,
|
 | staff and administrators of community-based
treatment programs designed specifically for juvenile offenders (including gang members and violent youth),
|
 | probation and parole officers,
|
 | juvenile officers,
|
 | documented and
undocumented gang members,
|
 | parents of gang members
|
 | victims of gangs and their parents,
|
 | prison officials,
|
 | students, school teachers, principals, and security
personnel,
|
 | social researchers,
|
 | business leaders,
|
 | therapists and counselors who worked with
gang members.
|
 | leaders of the faith community, and
|
 | local politicians (i.e., mayors, city managers, state
representatives, county commissioners, department of health administrators). |
|
In addition, informal "on the
street" interviews were conducted with people who were long-term residents or owners/employees of established businesses in
known gang neighborhoods. The informal interviews were used to
augment the formal interviews and provided a wealth of insights and ideas
which have found expression, in one way or another, throughout this book.
Participant
Observation
Using participant observation, researchers immerse themselves
in the physical setting in which the phenomenon being studied
takes place. Rather than stand on the sidelines and only observe
(as in observation studies), participant observers become a part of the
social setting being studied.
In this regard I participated in various treatment programs with
convicted gang members, in probation/parole home visits to gang clientele, and in
police gang unit officer visits to suspected gang members'
residences. Although participant
observation has its drawbacks (the most serious being the potential
influence of the participant
observer's presence and/or behavior on the behavior of those being studied),
its benefits may outweigh them.
Among the benefits derived in this study were gaining a greater
understanding of the behavior taking place by actually seeing and hearing
it, being able to interact with the subjects while the behavior was
occurring in order to better understand the reasons for their behavior, and
being able to gather first-hand evidence.
Participation in the Interagency
Task Force on Gangs and Youth Violence was another important part of
the research. It is a community task force which represents 23 counties in
the state of Missouri. Getting to know the "players" in the community (i.e.,
city manager,
mayor, chief and sheriff, prosecutor, school board members, county
commissioners, mental health workers), seeing
how decisions are made, determining what contributions, if any, I (or any other
similarly situated person) could make, all played a significant role in the
research process.
Review of the
Literature
The body of literature on gangs has become substantial and is rapidly
expanding. Included are
books, articles,
videos,
and web sites. I
have been reading about gangs, on and off, for the past four years and the effort continues to
this day.
Included in the materials I read were accounts of original or primary studies of
gangs (in which the author went into the field and studied gangs) and
secondary analyses
(in which the author reads and writes about primary studies conducted by
other researchers). Government reports,
documents written by law enforcement authorities on gangs,
and hundreds of informational pamphlets collected from treatment agencies, anti-gang programs, police departments,
and departments of correction were also read. A list of books and articles
used in the creation of Into the Abyss is found in
the
bibliography.
Qualitative
Analysis
Qualitative research uses methods such as participant observation or case
studies which result in a narrative, descriptive account of that which is
being studied rather than a numerical account. Qualitative research was
used as a way of understanding much that was shared during the
interviews.
Quantitative Analysis
Quantitative research uses methods allowing for the measurement of variables and
results in numerical data which can then be subjected to statistical analysis.
Where quantitative analysis appears in this book it is the product of other researchers'
work and is so noted. It adds another and needed dimension to our
understanding of the gang phenomenon.
Descriptive
Analysis
Analysis which focuses on describing the phenomenon being studied
is called descriptive analysis. Descriptive analysis was used
in this study to communicate what was found as a result of the interviews,
observation, and participant observation.
Explanatory
Analysis
Analysis which attempts to explain the phenomenon one is studying is referred to
as explanatory analysis. There are several places in this book
where explanatory analysis is used including explanations for why
gangs form and why some youths join them.
Next
Additional Resources: For links to
United States government-sponsored
research on gangs you can visit the National Criminal Justice Reference
Service, the National
Youth Gang Center, or the Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Many of the
publication you will find at those sites have been incorporated throughout Into
the Abyss.
© 2002
Michael K. Carlie
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in
writing from the author and copyright holder - Michael K. Carlie.
|